• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Our Legal Team
  • Cases and Legal Knowledge
  • Comment
  • Contact us
  • …  
    • Home
    • About
    • Services
    • Our Legal Team
    • Cases and Legal Knowledge
    • Comment
    • Contact us
    Legal Consultation
    • Home
    • About
    • Services
    • Our Legal Team
    • Cases and Legal Knowledge
    • Comment
    • Contact us
    • …  
      • Home
      • About
      • Services
      • Our Legal Team
      • Cases and Legal Knowledge
      • Comment
      • Contact us
      Legal Consultation

      起訴與交保

      · Legal Knowledge
      Section image

      起訴與交保

      民眾黨黨主席柯文哲,昨天經北檢起訴後,隨即將柯文哲移送法院,法院訊問後裁定以3000萬交保。

      為什麼柯文哲起訴後可以交保?

      法院在審酌是否需要 #繼續羈押 時,一定會考慮到,如果讓被告交保,刑事審判程序,是否還有可能因為被告 #逃亡 、 #勾串證人 等行為,而導致破壞後續審判的順利進行。

      我自己當辯護人時,常常會跟法院溝通,如果案件已經起訴,代表檢察官蒐證已經完畢、證人大多也都有傳喚作證過,證物也都扣押了,顯然不需要再透過羈押的方式,確保日後刑事程序的進行。

      不過,法院仍有可能認為,證人就算偵查中作證過,審判程序也可能會翻供,要等到法院交互詰問完畢後,才適合讓被告交保。

      在柯文哲案件中,難得一見的是,柯文哲全部否認犯罪(否認犯罪,其實繼續羈押的機率不低),但法院仍然認為,既然重要證人既然都已經作證了,目前檢方也沒有證明非繼續羈押柯文哲不可的理由,因此裁定交保。

      根據新聞報導,北檢將提出抗告,未來幾天高等法院是否會維持一樣的裁定,值得關注。

      Previous
      送禮大冒險:禮物,怎麼又回到我手上了?
      Next
      便當跟抹布,比機車更容易不見
       Return to site
      Cookie Use
      We use cookies to improve browsing experience, security, and data collection. By accepting, you agree to the use of cookies for advertising and analytics. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn More
      Accept all
      Settings
      Decline All
      Cookie Settings
      Necessary Cookies
      These cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies can’t be switched off.
      Analytics Cookies
      These cookies help us better understand how visitors interact with our website and help us discover errors.
      Preferences Cookies
      These cookies allow the website to remember choices you've made to provide enhanced functionality and personalization.
      Save